You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 2
Next »
Participants
Retrospective
What went well?
- Material was prepared and tested beforehand
- Start the organization of the workshop early-on
- Half-day sessions were good
- Presentations were lean and easy to follow
- Positive feedback from JAO (ALMA Chile) participants
- Instructors were very active
- It was easy to check on group progress using Slack
- Motivation and participation of the audience
- Some experienced participants added interesting information during presentations
- All groups completed the minimum requirements for the practical session (Functionality Implementation)
What could be done better?
- Communication between instructors could have been better
- Some groups were not working together at the beginning
- The participants didn't know what was expected at several practical sessions
- The main integration server was not ideal and was hard to share the work being done with participants
- More time for the project tests and integrations
- Organization of the material
- Communication with participants could be better (goals/expectation)
- Organization, improvisation and consistency of the agenda
- The observatory demonstration (speaking more, showing both the screen and the telescope, explaining the debugging, etc.)
- The CDB repository confused some of the participants
- Virtual machine issues (Problems, not prepared by the partcipants, etc.)
What else can we do?
What actions do we identify?